April 23, 2013

'In Defense Of Islam'

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is stating he and his brother killed three innocent people and blew the legs off dozens of others to defend Islam.

The surviving Boston Marathon bombing suspect has told investigators that his brother orchestrated the attacks because he 'wanted to defend Islam from attack', it emerged today.

But in scrawled notes made from his hospital bed, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, told Guantanamo Bay interrogators that he and his brother were not linked to any Islamic terrorist groups.

So what was the danger to Islam from an 8 year old Martin Richards? From the young exchange student, Lu Lingzi? From Krystal Campbell? How weak and frail is a religion that needs to kill and mutilate defenseless people to protect itself from mere insults? How justified is Islam to seek out and deliberately target unsuspecting women and children to kill?

After Islamic terrorist attacks, Muslims around the globe are quick to claim Islam does not support killing of innocents, but refuse to define "innocent," which does not apply to non-Muslims according to the Quran. They claim Islam condemns the killing of women and children, while ignoring Hadiths describing how Muhammad, Islam's perfect example, allowed the killing of women and children. They then go on to describe the suffering of Muslims in the West who must endure "Islamophobia" in the form of dirty looks or requests to remove head coverings. Oh, the horror.

Muslims are quick to claim Islamic terrorists are a tiny minority who do not represent the true values of a majority of Muslims, but then go on to hold all Americans accountable for perceived wrongs committed by the military during a war against terrorists who attacked us. It's really the same tactic being used by the left who say, "Don't judge all Muslims by the actions of a few," yet they are happy to blame all NRA members for the action of a few irresponsible, illegal gun owners.

'In defense of Islam' is the ultimate cop-out. It like the fox defending itself by killing the chickens who don't like it because it kills them. A circular logic. Muslims killing non-Muslims for suggesting Islam is violent.

The fact is, Islam doesn't need defending. No more than Christianity or Judaism or Buddhism or Hinduism does. Yet Islam is disproportionately more violent than all of them combined. All mainstream religions hold up against criticism and slurs. Only Islam is unable to stand without resorting to violence.Why? Because it is weak. 'Violence is the last refuge of incompetence.'

"Those who refuse to fight for Allah will be treated, along with their children, as unbelievers." (Surah 9:85)
By DMartyr at 10:15 AM | Comments |