May 06, 2012

British Media Provides Better Obama Coverage Than American MSM

Obama_Poster_Shhh.jpg

While searching for an appropriate image for this post, I didn't have one, I found the above at The Peoples Cube. Weird, it happened to be an image created because of one of our posts here.

Anyway, via BigG

It's been known for years that the US media has decided not to do its job when it comes to vetting Barack Obama, but when the British media is out there reporting critically on this White House on a daily basis, the contrast is startling.

If the Activist Old Media in this country had the ability to be embarrassed, they would cower in the corner over the way the British media pounds them on Obama coverage.

The American media chooses not to report these stories; it's not that they are getting "beaten" on them. Of course, that fact makes this much worse.

Dr. Tim Stanely of the UK Telegraph reports this week on the issue of President Obama's latest revelations of his "composite" girlfriend and the stories of him eating dog in Indonesia. In the last paragraph of his column, Dr. Stanley says these issues should've been brought out long ago, since Obama wrote of them in his book:[Continue reading]

Obama's a democrat and that's all the MSM needs to know about him. Oh, and he's a black Democrat.

Nuff said.

By Stable Hand at 12:16 AM | Comments |